How much does a Next.js marketing website cost?
A Next.js marketing website costs about $20,000 to $120,000 through an agency, based on the build prices in our 2026 research. The price depends on the number of unique layouts, the CMS you pair it with, integrations and how much custom design and motion is involved. These are typical ranges we see quoted, and they vary by team and region.
That's the highest band of the three platforms most startups consider. Agencies put Webflow website cost at about $5,000 to $80,000 or more and Framer builds at about $3,000 to $28,000. Code costs more because there's no visual builder doing part of the work: every component, CMS schema and deployment is set up by a developer.
Scope | Typical position in $20k–$120k | What's included |
|---|---|---|
Small site from finished designs | Low end | Build only, simple CMS, standard hosting |
Custom marketing site, 6–10 pages | Low to middle | Design, build, headless CMS, blog |
Site with integrations and app links | Middle to upper | Auth handoff, product data, CRM, analytics |
Large multi-locale site | Upper end or above | Localization, many collections, design system |
Designify website | $8,000 for 6 pages, +$500/page | Copy-first design, Next.js build, CMS, motion |
What drives the Next.js website development cost?
Five things drive Next.js website development cost: design scope, the CMS, integrations, performance work and who'll maintain it. Hosting is usually the smallest line.
- Design scope. Unique layouts and custom motion take the same design time on any platform, then need building in components.
- The CMS. A headless CMS like Payload, Sanity or Contentful needs schemas, previews and editor setup so marketers can work without a developer.
- Integrations. Pulling product data, connecting a CRM, gating content or sharing auth with your app are where code shines and where hours go.
- Performance. Next.js can be very fast, but only if images, fonts and third-party scripts are handled with care.
- Maintenance. Framework upgrades, dependency updates and structural changes need someone who reads code.
When is a custom coded website worth the price?
A custom coded website is worth the price when the site needs things a visual builder makes hard: deep integrations, strict performance targets, complex data, or a codebase your engineering team owns. If none of those apply, Framer or Webflow usually gives you more for less.
We build in Next.js, Framer and Webflow, so we don't have a reason to push one. Here's the honest split we use when advising founders.
Pros
- Full control over performance, markup and SEO
- Any integration: product data, auth, CRM, internal APIs
- No platform plan or seat limits on the site itself
- Your engineers can own and extend it
- Content can live in a CMS you choose and control
Cons
- Higher build cost in most agency quotes
- Structural changes need a developer
- Dependencies and framework upgrades need upkeep
- Marketers depend on how well the CMS was set up
Signals that you probably don't need Next.js yet
You probably don't need a coded site if your marketing team mainly edits copy and publishes blog posts, your integrations are a form, a scheduler and analytics, and nobody on the team writes code. A Framer or Webflow site will serve you well and cost less to change.
You probably do need it if your site shares components or data with your product, you're hitting a builder's CMS or localization limits, you need fine-grained performance control, or you want the site in the same repository as the rest of your engineering work.
What does a Next.js site cost to host and run?
A Next.js site costs relatively little to host, but the bill depends on the platform and how many people need access. The larger ongoing cost is the CMS subscription, if any, and developer time for changes.
Running cost | What to expect | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Hosting | Low for most marketing sites | Some hosts price team plans per seat; Cloudflare is usually cheapest |
Headless CMS | Free to paid, by seats and usage | Self-hosted options like Payload avoid seat fees |
Developer time | Hourly or retainer | Retainers in our research run about $2,000–$12,000 a month |
Monitoring and tools | Small monthly fees | Analytics, error tracking, forms |
Hosting pricing is shifting in 2026. Some hosts have moved to per-seat or credit-based pricing, and on Cloudflare, Workers is now recommended over Pages for new projects. Our own site runs on Next.js with Payload CMS on Cloudflare Workers, so that's a stack we know first-hand. Check each host's current plan page before you commit, and see our guide to how much a website costs for a startup for the full budget picture.
Is Next.js faster than Webflow or Framer?
Next.js can be faster than a visual builder, but it isn't automatically. Speed depends on how the site is built: images, fonts, scripts and how much JavaScript ships to the browser.
Core Web Vitals field data for Q2 2026 shows only about two-thirds of Next.js sites pass Interaction to Next Paint, with a median around 236 milliseconds. That's a reminder that the framework gives you control, not a guaranteed result. Third-party scripts, chat widgets and heavy client-side code are the usual causes of slow interactions. If performance is your reason for choosing code, make Core Web Vitals targets part of the scope and check them before launch, using guidance such as the Next.js documentation.
How do you compare Next.js quotes from different agencies?
Compare Next.js quotes by listing what each one includes, because the scope behind a $20,000 quote and a $90,000 quote is rarely the same. Ask every vendor the same questions.
- Is design included, or are you building from our files?
- Is copy included, and does that cover research and positioning?
- Which CMS, and who sets up the editor experience, including previews and reusable blocks?
- What hosting do you recommend, and what will it cost us per month?
- What happens after launch: handover, documentation, a support period or a retainer?
- Who owns the repository, accounts and domains? They should be yours from day one.
If you're choosing between partners, our list of Next.js agencies for marketing websites uses these criteria, and one team vs two vendors for design and development covers the coordination cost of splitting the work. If you're already on HubSpot, HubSpot CMS to Next.js explains the hybrid route.
